|
Can you imagine factoring a polynomial
using simple blocks? I was
skeptical until I saw, and then truly understood,
with Math-U-See.
From preschool to trigonometry, Steve
Demme, creator of Math-U-See, takes
complex mathematical concepts and uses
hands-on techniques to explain their underlying
meaning and significance. We
are thrilled to have him as our guest this
month at TOS!
TOS: I understand you previously taught
math in the school system? Did you use
these techniques then?
MR. DEMME: I taught in the schools
in the early 1980s, but I taught the traditional
way. I noticed, as a rule of thumb,
that most Americans can’t do word problems.
We teach them math by rote. You
plug in the numbers and pop out the responses.
But as far as computation skills,
we stack up pretty well against other
countries until fourth or fifth grade. Then
we have to start applying math, and that’s
where we really get into trouble, because
we have never learned concepts. In order
to teach concepts to kids, first, you have
to understand them yourself, and second,
you have to have some sort of tool or illustration
to teach the concepts. They need
to see it to understand it.
TOS: How did you become interested in
homeschooling?
MR. DEMME: We’ve been homeschooling
since 1982. Our kids have been homeschooled
all along the way. We have four
boys. The two oldest have graduated from
Bryan College in Tennessee. Our third
son is a freshman there now. Our fourth
boy, who is 18, has Down syndrome, so
he’ll be with us for a long time.
TOS: How did you develop this approach?
Did you study other people’s
work, or did you discover these teaching
ideas yourself?
MR. DEMME: I learned a bunch from J.
Mortensen, and he learned a lot from Montessori
methods. I think it was Newton
who said, “The reason I see further than
others is because I stand on the shoulders
of giants.” I used Saxon when I taught in
the schools and I used to sell Saxon. I really
liked his word problems and review.
When I was using the Mortensen/Montessori
materials, it wasn’t a complete
curriculum. So as I was tutoring kids, I
would teach them concretely with the
blocks, and then I would provide worksheets
for them. I never meant to write a
curriculum, but people started buying the
stuff I wrote when I was tutoring, and it
worked!
TOS: Were you tutoring while still teaching
in traditional school?
MR. DEMME: In a Christian school,
yes. And after that my wife and I started
a little company called Our Family Resources.
We had a phonics program and
we sold KONOS, Your Story Hour, and
things like that. This was back in 1989.
TOS: So what would you say is wrong
with the way math is traditionally taught,
and how have you sought to address that?
MR. DEMME: I don’t think the teachers
of today understand math! I think this
lack of understanding math actually goes
back a couple of generations. If you pinned
down your teacher and asked, “Why do
we do this?” not many could explain to
you why. You can’t teach kids to think if
you don’t understand it yourself. There’s a
percentage of kids who are going to “get
it” no matter how you teach and no matter
what curriculum you use. And most kids
need a teacher that understands the material
and can show them why it works.
One of the big emphases of Math-USee
is to produce better teachers. If you
watch the DVDs with your kids, you’ll
understand math and then you can apply
it. You know your kids better than I do.
If you have the math knowledge and the
tools, then you adapt it to your child.
TOS: I’ve seen that firsthand with trying
to teach my kids algebra. I’ve been telling
them, “Do this because it’s the way I was
taught and it’s the way the curriculum
says to do it.” As I’m now watching your
DVD WITH them, it’s wonderful. We’re
continuing to do our algebra, but with the
way you explain the concepts and why we
do what we do, it’s opening up entire new
vistas of understanding for them!
MR. DEMME: But don’t just leave it
there. The reason that you learn is not just
to learn new concepts but to apply them
in word problems. To do a word problem,
you need to know the rule and the process,
but you also need to know the concept.
TOS: You have stated that traditional
math places too great an emphasis on
memorization, yet to be successful in
math, students must do some memorizing.
They can memorize the multiplication
tables or skip counting sequences, for
example, but they are still memorizing.
What’s the difference?
MR. DEMME: Yes, you have to memorize
the rules as well as the concepts. I’ve
had kids who had successfully memorized
their multiplication facts but didn’t
know what it was that they memorized.
They couldn’t tell you the area of a room
with one-foot floor tiles. I’ve seen this
over and over again and the kids that have
simply memorized math facts couldn’t
solve a word problem to save their lives.
There is a school of thought that says,
“Just give them a calculator and don’t
require students to memorize basic math
facts.” I don’t agree with this. I think it is
important to memorize your basics, but it
is equally important to understand what it
is you have committed to memory.
TOS: How do you motivate a student who
hates math or has no interest in it?
MR. DEMME: I’ve tutored a lot of kids,
and when I tutor kids it’s usually the ones
who are having problems, not the gifted
kids. One of the things I do is show them
how practical it is. Then when I give them
manipulatives and show them how to do
a problem it really does make sense. And
they really can do it. I think most of the
time people don’t like math [it] is because
they aren’t any good at it. Personally I
don’t like hockey because I stink, but I
like basketball because I am good at it!
TOS: My high schoolers complain that
they see no point in learning algebra or
geometry. Can you give me some good
arguments to persuade them?
MR. DEMME: If you’ve ever done or
seen any kind of construction, it’s all geometry.
Roofing, getting square walls,
area, perimeter, volume—it’s all geometry.
The meaning of the word geometry
is “the measure of the earth.” So, geometry
is a very practical skill. Algebra is a
little trickier. You do use it in real life in
solving for missing information. Let’s say
you need x amount of money and you’re
making x amount an hour, how many
days will it take until you get that amount
of money? That’s an algebra problem.
But algebra is also a language. Once you
learn algebra, it’s a general language and
it gives you the tools to be able to learn
trigonometry and calculus.
TOS: So, it’s sort of like the phonics of
math.
MR. DEMME: Yes!
TOS: You have stated that all math boils
down to four levels: counting, adding,
multiplying, and exponents. Can you expand
on this?
MR. DEMME: When you think about
it, in its very basic sense math consists
of counting from 0 to 9. Fast counting
would be adding. Fast adding of the same
number is multiplying. Fast multiplying
of the same number is exponents. When
you have those four levels in front of you,
you realize that adding and its opposite,
subtracting, is level two. Multiplying, dividing,
and factoring would all be level
three. Exponents, roots, square roots,
cube roots, and logarithms are all level
four. I like to make math very practical,
but I also like to give students some broad
strokes of how it all fits together.
TOS: What is your view of testing in the
area of mathematics, especially for homeschoolers?
Many of us are not required to test. Should we or shouldn’t we?
MR. DEMME: There are two ways to
look at testing. If you’re taking a test from
one of my books, the real function of that
test is to see whether you’ve mastered
the material. We emphasize that you’ve
mastered the material in that lesson before
you move along to the next lesson.
Math is sequential. If you haven’t mastered
adding, then you have no business
being in multiplication. So testing to see
if your child has mastered the material is
very good. Standardized testing serves
no purpose. The only reason to have
standardized testing is to show how you
measure up against students all across the
country. It’s not going to tell you whether
you’ve mastered material. It’s just going
to show you how you measure up against
other students. Fifty percent is the average,
with half the kids above and half below.
This type of testing is used by colleges
to see whether you’re at the top or
the bottom of the class. We hardly ever
tested our own kids.
TOS: You have rewritten the levels
of Math-U-See. Is there really a big
difference?
MR. DEMME: It’s the only rewriting
we’ve had! We’ve been tweaking
for years, but we finally got to the point
where there were a couple of things I
really wanted to have in there—for example,
things like measurement. At the
lower levels, this is one of the best places
that you can apply math, such as changing
ounces to pounds, yards to feet, etc.
We only had that measurement in individual
lessons and it wasn’t being reviewed
throughout the student books. That was
a biggie. Subtraction and division review
were also strengthened.
The original books were written over
a span of several years. The new books
were all written at the same time and
they’re more integrated, like a seamless
garment. We’re reviewing things and carrying
more concepts better from one book
to the next.
Also, the first three videos filmed in
1994 were not digital. We needed to refilm
those because we’re getting requests
to do Math-U-See in different languages.
And now that they’re all digital, people
can watch the DVDs on their computers.
TOS: How does a parent decide where to
place a child? Can a child easily transition
from traditional math to Math-U-See
at any level?
MR. DEMME: There are placement
tests on the website. If they transfer in
from another text, no problem. Sometimes
it’s good to borrow the lower level videos
from someone, because a student coming
in from another text may have memorized
how, but they’ve never learned why. Just
watching the videos and playing with
the manipulatives will help them get the
concepts.
TOS: I would imagine that all types of
learners would have success with this approach.
True?
MR. DEMME: Yes, because we’re not
just making it visual. We say to build it,
write it, say it. We’re using your auditory,
visual, and kinesthetic systems. The
whole thing is that when you’re going to
teach concepts, you have to have some
kind of tool as an illustration. Math-USee
provides that.
TOS: Off subject a bit here, but do you
think we’ll ever go totally metric in this
country?
MR. DEMME: No. I wish we would.
The more I’ve learned about the decimal
system, it’s a natural fit. Let’s say you’re
under a car, you have a 16 mm wrench and
it is too small. You just reach out for a 17
mm wrench. But if you have a 3/8” tool
and need the next size, there is no 4/8”
wrench, only 1/2” or 7/16”. The rest of
the world has already changed, and we’ve
just kept going and I don’t think we have
much change left in us.
TOS: I noticed the Math-U-See Foundation
at your website. I did not know that
you are available to speak on a number of
topics in addition to math. Please tell us
about them.
MR. DEMME: I’m leaving for Thailand
soon, where I’m speaking to missionary
families. I’ll do two math talks and
four talks about the family, along with
some consulting. When I was in Kenya,
it was the first ever homeschool conference
for Kenyans and missionaries. There
I did only one math talk and seven family
talks. I like math, but the biggest thing
is that I want kids to be home learning
with their families. I’m pro-God, which
makes me pro-family, and it just seems
like homeschooling is the best way to be
pro-family.
My ministry is expanding in this direction.
I’m writing a stewardship book now,
a Christian approach to finances, written
as my advice to my boys. I have 38
devotions on how I’ve applied the Scripture
to my boys and I’ve got 30 lessons
on finances—credit cards, how to buy a
car, etc. (This has been out since August
2005.)
TOS: That Foundation work sounds exciting—
and needed.
MR. DEMME: Yes. When you’re homeschooling,
you’re together all the time.
It’s a 24/7 deal. When you’re in the house
with these same kids, you need to figure
out how we’re going to resolve conflict,
in the Spirit, [and] you have to understand
personalities, why they act the way
they do. The things that I talk about in
family seminars [are] our testimony of
things that we’ve done in our home that
worked. Real-world training is learning
how to get along with people. That’s real
socialization.
Part of what really attracted my wife
and me to homeschooling in the first place
was that we started seeing teenagers that
really liked their parents, and they were
still getting along with them. The other
positive benefit is that our sons are each
other’s best friends. Loving each other is
what it’s all about.
We are so grateful to have had this
enlightening conversation with Steve
Demme. To learn more about Math-U-See
or about the Math-U-See Foundation,
visit www.mathusee.com. When you see
it and understand it, you won’t be intimidated
by teaching your children math, and
they will truly comprehend the concepts.
What a blessing!
Christine M. Field, TOS’s Resource Room columnist, practiced law for eight years before becoming a full-time mommy for her four children. Her husband serves as Chief of Police in Wheaton, Illinois. She is a freelance writer and the author of several books about homeschooling, adopting, and more. www.HomeFieldAdvantage.org www.HomeschoolBlogger.com/ChristineField
Copyright 2006. The Old Schoolhouse Magazine, Spring 2006, pages 68-70.
Did you enjoy this article? You'll find each issue of The Old Schoolhouse Magazine packed with great articles to inform you, encourage you, and remind you that you're not alone. Plus, you can receive 19 free gifts when you subscribe. Subscribe today!
www.TheHomeschoolMagazine.com
|